Italy-Tactics

Up 2-1 and with a foot in the door of qualifying for the European Championship next summer, he knew his side could not throw away this opportunity. Indeed, a win in his team’s last two matches would be enough to qualify.

He wanted to finish the job that night however.

With an interception and powerful strike by Matteo Darmian to make it 3-1 over Azerbaijan, Antonio Conte exulted like a madman, embracing his coaching staff in a huddle. Italy were through to Euro 2016. The hard part was over.

Firstly, credit has to be given to the coach for extending the Azzurri’s unbeaten record to 50 qualifying matches, which incredibly stretches back to 2006.

But when the emotional high of qualifying fades away, one can begin to analyse the past year under the ex-Juventus boss with a clear mind.

What has worried Azzurri supporters more than anything else are the tactics, selections and decisions made by Conte during the past year and his stubbornness to implement change.

Drawn in a group that included Croatia, Norway, Bulgaria, Azerbaijan, and Malta, Italy finished first with 24 points.

At first glance, the country’s results seem overwhelmingly positive. However, the manner in which the matches were won has sparked some initial cause for concern among supporters.

Even with formation changes from a 3-5-2 to a 4-3-3 and now 4-4-2/4-2-4, dull, unimaginative play has characterised this current Italy side and watching their fixtures has become something of a chore.

Their style of play has lacked invention and excitement going forward and Italy have had to grind out results in nearly every game, yet to properly convince the Azzurri faithful.

A big issue Conte has failed to address is the glaring lack of creativity in attack for the Azzurri. Preferring substance over style, chances have been hard to come by and his side have been short of a couple of players to spark the attack while also linking midfield.

Over the past year creative player types like Lorenzo Insigne and Franco Vazquez have been shoved aside in place of more physical figures to Conte’s liking, without a clear indication why.

With his side struggling to create chances in open play, uninspiring displays have become the norm.

Ciro Immobile and Simone Zaza started in the first four of five qualifiers but now Graziano Pelle and Eder seem to have won the coach over, with Antonio Candreva and Stephan El Shaarawy also finding regular minutes under the 46-year-old.

Having found pairings to his liking, Conte has been stubborn to change, and has not done enough to shuffle a stale attack that is lacking invention and unpredictability.

While narrowly getting by teams of lower calibre may have been alright in the qualifying phase, the question begs what will happen come Euro 2016 when Italy face sides that will allow just a couple of chances per game such as Spain, Germany or host nation France?

Although Conte has cited the small pool of Italians available for national team selection, he has failed to call upon the country’s best players and properly integrate new attacking talent in his starting XI.

Regarding player selection, supporters have been frustrated and puzzled by the lack of consistency in Conte’s word. While the 46-year-old has claimed playing time remains the most important factor when making decisions, he has called up various players that are not recording regular minutes for their clubs and or aren’t in great form to begin with.

Additionally, various talented players that have found less minutes at their clubs won’t make Conte’s squad, using his ruling to justify their absence.

The result? It has become clear the 46-year-old seems to bend his rule for some players but not others. He’s made it clear who his favourites are while also preferring players who will be run into the ground to make up for their lower levels of skill.

In Conte’s recent call-ups for friendlies against Belgium and Romania, many in-form players have been surprisingly excluded while the 46-year-old also missed the opportunity to try out emerging talents. These include Riccardo Saponara, Jorginho, Daniele Baselli, Davide Zappacosta, and Vazquez.

These next two matches serve the primary purpose of assessing different players but unfortunately out-of-form figures in Candreva, Mattia De Sciglio, Alessio Cerci, and Simone Zaza have been called up instead.

Azzurri fans can only hope Conte can construct a starting XI over the next few months with improved attacking play and hungry new faces.

Fortunately, we’re many months away from the final deadline. All we can do is wait and see.

About the author – Matthew Amalfitano

Freelance football writer. Work published by FourFourTwo, the Independent, Betfair, beIN Sports USA, Squawka and others.

twitter: _MattFootball

PLAY SOCCER MANAGER 2016 NOW

Share this article:

German-Tactics

It was not Germany’s most memorable European Championship campaign — as Die Mannschaft lost to both Poland and Ireland — yet in the end a rather disappointing 2-1 victory not only secured Germany a spot in next year’s European Championships in France, but also meant that the World Champions had finished Group D in first place.

Germany’s poor form at the qualifiers can be attributed to the hangover of winning the World Cup in 2014, as the tournament in Brazil was considered one of the toughest to win — given climate and distances to travel — and it was clear that many German players were struggling with fatigue in the following 2014-15 season. Furthermore, several key players — Miroslav Klose, Per Mertesacker, and Philipp Lahm — retired from the national team following the victory over Argentina in Rio de Janeiro.

The retirement of former national team captain Philipp Lahm in particular left a gaping hole in Germany’s game. Lahm is a rare breed in German football as he can play both as a right back and a left back. Yet Germany’s national team coach Joachim Löw had previously struggled to find capable players for both the right and left defensive positions even with Lahm in the line-up.

Leading up to the World Cup, Bayern’s coach Pep Guaridola moved Lahm into centre, playing him as a defensive midfielder. As a result Löw also moved Lahm into the centre midfield, and therefore ended up fielding four centre backs in the World Cup until the quarter final against France—Schalke’s Benedikt Höwedes played as a left back, and Shkodran Mustafi (now with Valencia) as right back — when an injury to Mustafi forced Löw to move Lahm to the right back position to replace Mustafi.

But with Lahm’s retirement, Löw no longer had this option. As a result it appeared that the German game lacked defensive wingers who could also contribute offensively. The recent emergence of left back Jonas Hector, who plays for 1. FC Köln, has given Löw a fantastic option. On the other wing, Borussia Dortmund’s Matthias Ginter has also impressed this season — he has accumulated two goals and four assists in ten Bundesliga games.

Yet Löw has criticized that neither Ginter nor Hector provide an attacking element in Germany’s game — despite both players having contributed significantly to the attacking game with their respective clubs. In the past the national team coach has been equally critical of other defensive backs, in particular Dortmund’s Marcel Schmelzer, who Löw criticised after Schmelzer made a mistake in a World Cup qualifier against Austria in October 2012 by remarking that “I can’t carve myself a better left back…”­­ (a German expression implying that if he could have carved himself a better left back, he would have done so).

Yet Schmelzer performed well for Borussia Dortmund, which stormed all the way to the Champions League final against Bayern Munich in that season, showing consistency against opponents far stronger than what Germany faced in qualification matches. Löw’s recent round of criticism against Hector, whose current form has made Fox Sport’s Bundesliga specialist Eric Wynalda suggest that Hector should be a logical candidate for a transfer to Bayern Munich, has led to suggestions in the German press that perhaps the failure is not in the lack of good wing back but rather in Joachim Löw’s tactical system.

Speaking to Germany’s Kicker Magazine, Ginter recently stated that: “at Dortmund, teamwork is everything, whereas Germany’s game has a larger tendency to trust individuality.” In other words defensive players can’t operate offensively in Germany’s game under Löw as they often must focus on defense. Players such as Lukas Podolski, Mesut Özil, or even Thomas Müller in Germany’s 3-1 win against Poland; have the tendency not to backtrack when playing in Löw’s system.

The offensive contribution of both Hector and Ginter at the club level, and the fact that already established left backs such as Marcel Schmelzer have shown that they can perform at the highest level when playing for their clubs, highlight that Germany doesn’t have a wing back problem, but rather Löw has to make tactical adjustments to his system that would allow more offensive contributions from the back without threatening the defensive line. In the past Löw has been very good at making the necessary adjustments before major tournaments, and as Germany gets ready for France 2016, Löw will have to show once again that he can find tactical solutions with the players at hand.

About the author – Manuel Veth

Manuel Veth is a freelance journalist and Editor in Chief @FutbolgradLive and writes about the economics and politics of Soviet and post-Soviet football. You can find his work at Futbolgrad.com.

twitter: @homosovieticus

PLAY SOCCER MANAGER 2016 NOW

Share this article: